|
Dear Reader, There is a particular kind of leader who never seems rattled. Who responds to every crisis with composure. Who, when asked how they are doing, says: fine. Busy, but fine. Organisations tend to reward this leader. They are promoted. They are held up as models of strength. Their capacity to absorb pressure without visible distress is read as capability. But in my experience, the leader who is always okay is often the most significant source of cultural damage in an organisation, not despite their apparent composure, but because of it. When someone says they are fine, I question it. If you have ever been one of my clients, one of the things we extensively talk about and which I compassionately call you out on are: How Are You and the answer I am okay, or I am fine. No you are not. Are you really? Psychological invulnerability in a leader does not create psychological safety in a team.
It eliminates it.
When leaders model the suppression of difficulty, when they communicate, through their behavior, that being affected by hard things is not acceptable here, the people around them receive that message clearly. They learn that struggle should be hidden. That uncertainty should be managed down rather than named. That the appropriate response to difficulty is performance of competence, not honest acknowledgement of complexity. The result is a culture of surface performance. Teams that look aligned and function adequately. And beneath that surface, the quiet accumulation of unspoken concerns, unresolved tensions, and the particular exhaustion of people who are working hard while simultaneously managing the impression they are giving. This is not what psychological safety means. Psychological safety is not the absence of discomfort. It is the presence of conditions in which people can speak honestly about difficulty without fear of consequence. And those conditions are created, or destroyed, primarily by the behavior of the leader. The leader who is always okay is communicating that difficulty should be absorbed privately. Which means the people working with them are absorbing it privately. Which means the organisation is running on hidden load. The leaders I most respect are not the ones who have eliminated difficulty from their experience. They are the ones who have developed the capacity to be genuinely present with difficulty, their own and others', without being de-stabilised by it. That is a fundamentally different thing from always being okay.
That is what actually builds culture. Not the performance of strength. The genuine embodiment of it. The work I do is about Being and Embodying Leadership itself. You become the walking and talking example of what is to be a human leader, and from that understanding, cultivate the level of psychological safety that allows yourself and your teams to step in, flourish and contribute at even higher levels. People + Performance = Higher ROI. A client testimonial:
The coaching environment allowed me to be vulnerable, search and reflect on my personal & professional life which then helped in shaping the way we related. Thank you Barbra for going beyond and being resourceful with lots of practical information critical for my growth in this Leadership Journey. I highly recommend your services to all especially those who have the โI CANโTโ mentality, because I KNOW that with Barbara, THEY CAN & THEY WILL for itโs all about the mindset and the right Coach: HR Business Partner
|
You have done everything right. And still, something essential is missing. This newsletter is for leaders who sense that the gap between who they are on the outside and who they know themselves to be on the inside is the most important territory they have not yet explored. Each letter is a dispatch from that territory - honest, direct, and grounded in 25+ years of work across four continents. Website: https://designyourlifefoundation.com
Dear Reader, Most of the strategy execution failures I have worked with are, at their root, Translation Failures. The leadership team may have a clear and shared understanding of the direction, but that understanding has not been translated into something the different teams can actually follow. But solving it requires something different from a better implementation framework. It requires the leadership team to do the work of genuinely inhabiting the strategy, to be able to speak to it, live...
Dear Reader, There is a line I return to often in my work with senior leadership teams: What leadership cannot hold does not disappear. It gets carried by the people below the leadership line. Always. You may already feel this in your organisation, not in the performance numbers, which are broadly fine, but in something harder to name. A heaviness. A tiredness in capable people that the results do not explain. A sense that the organisation is working harder than it should have to, to produce...
Dear Reader, When I tell people I am a medical anthropologist who works with executive leaders and organisations, the response is usually one of two things. The first is curiosity, a sense that these things should not go together, but something in the combination is intriguing. The second is polite confusion. What does anthropology have to do with leadership? The Answer is: Everything. And the gap between what anthropological training sees in an organization and what standard leadership...