|
Dear Reader, One of the things that fascinated me as a young professional decades ago, was how organizations would spend so much money on taking their leaders out of town, to spend days working on their next 5 to 10 year strategy. It wasnโt the action of doing so that fascinated me, but the sheer disregard of the time, cost and energy that this collectively bore, only for the strategies to not be put into effect once everyone was back in the office. This was not to say that the strategies they developed were not excellent. They genuinely were rigorous, clear and ambitious without being delusional to the point. The results of these strategies, when put into action, would be positively exponential for not only the leaders and the organization as a whole, but clients, customers, business partners and all other stakeholders. Leaders leave the sessions energized, and ready for the results. Here was and is the challenge
But because the moment they returned to their organisation, they walked back into a culture that the strategy had never accounted for, a culture shaped not by their stated values, but by the unspoken rules of how decisions actually got made, how conflict was actually handled, and what actually happened to people who challenged the status quo.
Culture, which as been unfortunately mis-defined over time, is literally the build-up of How you do what you do, as an organization, as a leader, and as an individual. The consistent accumulation of how you do (or not do) what you do, over time, becomes the culture. In short, the organizational values, embedded in your everyday actions, activities, behaviors and habits...over time...become what we then see and experience as team or organizational culture. What is missing in a lot of offsite strategy sessions is that the leaders themselves, are the main proponents of a culture. Not in a dictatorial manner, because that is surface based, and growing evidence is showing us the top down way of leadership is not only archaic, but erodes your bottom line over time. But within their own internal makeup, basically who they really are beneath the facade of titles, roles and outer appearances. A leader's internal make-up, affects how their team members do (or do not do) what they are supposed to, or not supposed to do. The more a leader knows who they are, not in competition to another person, and not to be an idealized version of themselves as expected of others, but their true self, the better able they are at creating psychologically safe environments for those they lead to step in, flourish and contribute at even higher levels. The gap between what leadership intends and what organisations actually do is rarely a planning problem. It is almost always a leadership and culture problem. The above image is the pattern I encounter most consistently in my work with executive teams. Not absence of vision. Not absence of capability. But a fundamental misalignment between:
And here is why this mattersYou cannot close these gaps with a better planning process. You cannot close them with clearer communication. You cannot close them with more rigorous project management, more frequent check-ins, or a more detailed implementation framework. You can only close it by addressing the leadership culture itself. Which means addressing how leaders think, how they relate, and how they make decisions when no one is watching, and what they unconsciously model for everyone below them in the organisation. This is absolutely uncomfortable work, especially for those who heavily rely on the top down way of leadership, and or are not ready for that deeper introspection that goes below what most personal and professional development programs offer. Why? Because it requires leaders to shift their attention from the external challenge, the market, the competition, the operational complexity (because these can be easily rectified with the right focus and attention) to the more complex internal one. This speaks to the question of what is it that is happening internally, at conscious, sub and superconscious levels, that is affecting and dictating how they are showing up. Not what they are saying. But HOW they are being. In my experience, the most common reason this inner work does not happen is not resistance. It is that no one has framed the problem correctly. Leaders are told they have a strategy execution problem. They are given more tools, more processes, more frameworks. And the actual source of the blockage, causing a problematic outer culture, goes unexamined. Socio-cultural and Medical anthropology gave me a way of seeing beneath the surface of organisational life that most leadership consultants do not have. Ethnographic training teaches you to look not at what people say but at what they do, but at the unspoken norms, the rituals of power, the stories that get told and the ones that never do. That lens, applied to an organisation, reveals the gap between stated culture and lived culture with uncomfortable precision. You can read more here on What I Look For When I Walk Into An Organization.โ A quick testimonial for work I did with an organization around wellness:
Barbara Mutedzi proved to be the right choiceโฆAs a collaborator, her professionalism was A+. Her knowledge of my subject delivered nuanced and layered insight on the subject matter and helped to quantitatively illustrate the efficacy of my well-being initiative. Also, her disposition felt rooted in a strong character. I would work with her again and highly recommend her. Tina Lifford: African American Actor from the hit series Queen Sugar & Founder of The Inner Fitness Initiative.
Summary - What I find, consistently, is this:Organisations do not have a strategy problem. They have a leadership coherence problem. The strategy reflects what the leadership team aspires to. The culture reflects who they actually are. And the people in the organisation, far more perceptive than their leaders typically give them credit for, are responding to the latter, not the former. Closing that gap is possible. But it requires something that most leadership development programs are not designed to deliver: genuine inner work. Not skills training. Not competency frameworks. The willingness to examine how you lead, not only what you do. That is where the real strategy work begins.The work I do focuses on both the inner and the outer strategy in equal measure. One influences the other intertwined in sometimes unclear ways. I am trained, qualified and have +2 decades of experience seeing and feeling beneath the surface of your titles, roles and actions.
In the meantime, I have three specific offerings available through March, April, and May 2026: If you refer someone who books a paid engagement, I would like to thank you with a complimentary coaching or advisory session:
Thank you for taking a moment to think of who in your world might need this. It means more than I can say. Click here for the attachment that you can share with your network. Speak soon!โโ With loving kindness, grace and gratitude,
|
You have done everything right. And still, something essential is missing. This newsletter is for leaders who sense that the gap between who they are on the outside and who they know themselves to be on the inside is the most important territory they have not yet explored. Each letter is a dispatch from that territory - honest, direct, and grounded in 25+ years of work across four continents. Website: https://designyourlifefoundation.com
Dear Reader, Most of the strategy execution failures I have worked with are, at their root, Translation Failures. The leadership team may have a clear and shared understanding of the direction, but that understanding has not been translated into something the different teams can actually follow. But solving it requires something different from a better implementation framework. It requires the leadership team to do the work of genuinely inhabiting the strategy, to be able to speak to it, live...
Dear Reader, There is a line I return to often in my work with senior leadership teams: What leadership cannot hold does not disappear. It gets carried by the people below the leadership line. Always. You may already feel this in your organisation, not in the performance numbers, which are broadly fine, but in something harder to name. A heaviness. A tiredness in capable people that the results do not explain. A sense that the organisation is working harder than it should have to, to produce...
Dear Reader, When I tell people I am a medical anthropologist who works with executive leaders and organisations, the response is usually one of two things. The first is curiosity, a sense that these things should not go together, but something in the combination is intriguing. The second is polite confusion. What does anthropology have to do with leadership? The Answer is: Everything. And the gap between what anthropological training sees in an organization and what standard leadership...